Intelligent Design

I cant wait until Ben Stein’s new movie Expelled, No Intelligence Allowed comes out! I will be at the theater for opening night no matter what!

Here is a preview for the new movie in case you haven’t heard about it yet:

I am so glad someone has finally stood up and spoke out against Darwinism being taught in schools. I myself am a firm believer in Creation. Not just because of being raised as a Christian but also because Evolution and Darwinism really just doesn’t make sense to me. Yet as soon as I say this in public (as I just have) all of a sudden I am looked down upon and even mocked! Why?

I have yet to see a convincing theory stating that I am a result of a chemical reaction millions of years ago and/or that I came from some puddle and slowly evolved into what I am today. Every theory of this nature that I have read has either been silly or down right retarded to me. So why shouldn’t I believe in Creation? Even if I wasn’t raised up in Christianity why would believing in Creation as a “theory” be any better or worse than believing in Evolution as a “theory”? Shouldn’t I be allowed to believe or dis-believe in whichever “theory” I choose?

What would happen if I walked into a science classroom in a Public School or College tomorrow morning and said: “I believe that Creation is how the world came about and how life started. I also believe that Evolution is a total lie”. I would be removed from that classroom immediately and would be in trouble. Why? Why is my “theory” wrong and yours is right?

Check out this video were scientist have been cut down because they want to question Darwinism:

All these people did was ask the question “Why?” and look at what has happened to them. Isn’t part of being a Scientist figuring out how things happen, or in this case happened? Why is it so wrong to stop and check out a different angle on the subject?

If someone is investigating something, whether its a Detective investigating a crime or a Scientist investigating a theory, shouldn’t every possible aspect be examined? My big question is: Why wouldn’t a Scientist at the very least “look into” the possibility of Intelligent Design? Can someone even truly be considered a Scientist if they cut corners and over look things as they investigate the universe? Shouldn’t they at lest completely rule out all the aspects before coming to the conclusion that Creation is wrong?

I don’t believe there are any “holes” or flaws in the theory of Creation as it has been taught to me. Yet, all through Evolution and Darwinism I see quite a few “holes”, unanswered questions, and stuff that seems lacking in evidence. (Once again, from the way it’s been taught to me.)

Why can’t Scientists investigate Intelligent Design from a non-biased standpoint? Is this really such a bad thing? Even if we are proven wrong they should at least be aloud to fully investigate our “theory”!